Re: [PATCH 00/16] Add support for Lattice MachXO2 programming via I2C

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 12:00:44PM +0300, Ivan Bornyakov wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 10:25:39AM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > Hi Ivan,
> > 
> > On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 06:25:14PM +0300, Ivan Bornyakov wrote:
> > > Hi, Johannes!
> > > 
> > > I just came across your patches. Surprisingly, our work interferes.
> > > 
> > > I recently posted patch-series for configuring ECP5 and was asked to make
> > > generalized sysCONFIG driver with support for both ECP5 and MachXO2, which
> > > I did. Sadly I don't have hardware with MachXO2, but you clearly do :)
> > > 
> > > Please, take a look at
> > > 
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fpga/20220825112433.14583-1-i.bornyakov@xxxxxxxxxxx/
> > > 
> > > and please help test MachXO2 variant. When we pull this off, you may add I2C
> > > interface on top.
> > 
> > You are adding a new driver for something we already have a driver for
> > in the tree.
> 
> My intent was to add new driver and drop old one once the new driver is
> proven to be working.
> 
> > The final goal should be that we only have a single driver
> > for sysconfig based FPGAs in the tree.
> 
> It is.
> 
> > Johannes' series is a step in
> > that direction: He cleans up the existing driver and starts abstracting
> > out common sysconfig functions so that they can be used by both the I2C
> > and SPI interface. He just told me that the abstraction is likely not
> > enough to integrate ECP5 support right away, one reason being that the
> > machxo2 has a flash whereas the ECP5 does not.
> > 
> > Unless you can explain why the existing driver is broken beyond repair
> > I think we should rather incrementally improve the existing driver
> > instead of adding a new one with a conflicting compatible.
> 
> Yeah, conflicting compatible was my oversight.
> 

Wait! They are not conflicting :) The new one is "lattice,machxo2-fpga-mgr",
the old one is "lattice,machxo2-slave-spi"

> > So despite you were in the room earlier I think you should rather base
> > your work on Johannes' series.
> 
> We on par here. You guys didn't join ongoing work, I didn't rework
> existing driver.
> 
> > 
> > Just my 2 cents, maybe one of the maintainers has a few words on it.
> > 
> > Sascha
> > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
> > Steuerwalder Str. 21                       | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
> > 31137 Hildesheim, Germany                  | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
> > Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |




[Index of Archives]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux