In OFS legacy model, there is 1:1 mapping for Port device and VF,
so it need to check the number of released port match the number of
VFs or not. But in "Multiple VFs per PR slot" model, there is 1:N
mapping for the Port device and VFs.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Gerlach <matthew.gerlach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Tianfei zhang <tianfei.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/fpga/dfl.c | 10 ++++++----
drivers/fpga/dfl.h | 2 ++
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/fpga/dfl.c b/drivers/fpga/dfl.c
index 712c53363fda..b95b29c5c81d 100644
--- a/drivers/fpga/dfl.c
+++ b/drivers/fpga/dfl.c
@@ -1707,11 +1707,13 @@ int dfl_fpga_cdev_config_ports_vf(struct dfl_fpga_cdev *cdev, int num_vfs)
mutex_lock(&cdev->lock);
/*
- * can't turn multiple ports into 1 VF device, only 1 port for 1 VF
- * device, so if released port number doesn't match VF device number,
- * then reject the request with -EINVAL error code.
+ * In the OFS legacy model, it can't turn multiple ports into 1 VF
+ * device, because only 1 port conneced to 1 VF device, so if released
+ * port number doesn't match VF device number, then reject the request
+ * with -EINVAL error code.
*/
- if (cdev->released_port_num != num_vfs) {
+ if ((dfl_has_port_connected_afu(cdev) &&
+ cdev->released_port_num != num_vfs)) {
ret = -EINVAL;
goto done;
}
diff --git a/drivers/fpga/dfl.h b/drivers/fpga/dfl.h
index bc56b7e8c01b..83c2c50975e5 100644
--- a/drivers/fpga/dfl.h
+++ b/drivers/fpga/dfl.h
@@ -471,6 +471,8 @@ void dfl_fpga_enum_info_free(struct dfl_fpga_enum_info *info);
#define DFL_PORT_CONNECT_BITS MAX_DFL_FPGA_PORT_NUM
#define DFL_FEAT_PORT_CONNECT_MASK ((1UL << (DFL_PORT_CONNECT_BITS)) - 1)
+#define dfl_has_port_connected_afu(cdev) ((cdev)->flags & DFL_FEAT_PORT_CONNECT_MASK)
+
/**
* struct dfl_fpga_cdev - container device of DFL based FPGA
*
--
2.26.2
