> -----Original Message----- > From: Yusuf Khan <yusisamerican@xxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Tuesday, March 1, 2022 9:59 AM > To: Wu, Hao <hao.wu@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Xu, Yilun <yilun.xu@xxxxxxxxx>; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux- > fpga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; mdf@xxxxxxxxxx; trix@xxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] pga: dfl: pci: Make sure DMA related error check is > not done twice > > Will do, but I do not know exactly what to remove from the commit message, > I understand what to do for the title > > > > > NOTE: This patch is only for use in the linux-next branch as the > > > > > commit that caused this bug happened there. Remove this NOTE Hao > > Yusuf > > On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 1:58 AM Wu, Hao <hao.wu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 08:39:48PM -0800, Yusuf Khan wrote: > > > > Note: This bug was introduced here: > > > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux- > > > next.git/patch/?id=ada3caabaf6135150077c3f729bb06e8f3b5b8f6 > > > > I saw this commit inside the linux-next branch, it is not present in > > > > the mainline branch. > > > > The linux-next branch was last updated 5 days ago, so I am unsure > > > > about the state of that commit. > > > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 8:27 PM Yusuf Khan <yusisamerican@xxxxxxxxx> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > In the case that the DMA 64 bit bit mask error check does not fail, > > > > > the error check will be done twice, this patch fixed that. > > > > > > > > > > NOTE: This patch is only for use in the linux-next branch as the > > > > > commit that caused this bug happened there. > > > > Thanks for the patch. > > please remove this from the commit message, and fix the title > > s/pga/fpga/ > > > > Thanks > > Hao > > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Yusuf Khan <yusisamerican@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > > --- > > > > > drivers/fpga/dfl-pci.c | 9 +++++---- > > > > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/fpga/dfl-pci.c b/drivers/fpga/dfl-pci.c > > > > > index 717ac9715970..6222f18aed4b 100644 > > > > > --- a/drivers/fpga/dfl-pci.c > > > > > +++ b/drivers/fpga/dfl-pci.c > > > > > @@ -356,11 +356,12 @@ int cci_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pcidev, const > > > struct pci_device_id *pcidevid) > > > > > pci_set_master(pcidev); > > > > > > > > > > ret = dma_set_mask_and_coherent(&pcidev->dev, > DMA_BIT_MASK(64)); > > > > > - if (ret) > > > > > - ret = dma_set_mask_and_coherent(&pcidev->dev, > > > DMA_BIT_MASK(32)); > > > > > if (ret) { > > > > > - dev_err(&pcidev->dev, "No suitable DMA support available.\n"); > > > > > - goto disable_error_report_exit; > > > > > + ret = dma_set_mask_and_coherent(&pcidev->dev, > > > DMA_BIT_MASK(32)); > > > > > + if (ret) { > > > > > + dev_err(&pcidev->dev, "No suitable DMA support > > > available.\n"); > > > > > + goto disable_error_report_exit; > > > > > + } > > > > > > Looks good to me. > > > > > > Acked-by: Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > ret = cci_init_drvdata(pcidev); > > > > > -- > > > > > 2.25.1 > > > > >
