> -----Original Message----- > From: Xu, Yilun <yilun.xu@xxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Sunday, September 26, 2021 1:45 PM > To: Moritz Fischer <mdf@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: linux-fpga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Wu, Hao > <hao.wu@xxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: Maintenance of Linux FPGA > > On Sat, Sep 25, 2021 at 11:39:23AM -0700, Moritz Fischer wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I lately did not have enough time to dedicate to the Linux FPGA > > subsystem, concerns were raised around bus-factor and all. > > > > Looking at my day-job I don't see this getting better in the short-term > > so I've decided to get a conversation going on how to structure this > > better for the benefit of the Linux FPGA subsystem. > > > > Maybe a maintainer team approach would address the bus factor and > > workload concerns better? > > > > In terms of people I was thinking about: > > > > Hao has done a great job at keeping the DFL part of things going, so I > > think he'd be a great choice. > > > > Yilun has been very helpful with reviews and I think he'd be a good > > pick, too. > > It's my pleasure for the nomination and yes I'd like to be one of the > maintainer team, to be more helpful. Hi Moritz, Me too, it's really a great pleasure. Thanks a lot for giving me this opportunity, I hope I can do more contributions. Thanks Hao > > Thanks, > Yilun > > > > > In terms of how to structure this: I'm not sure just yet, open to input. > > > > How do other multi-maintainer subsystems operate? Ideas? Suggestions? > > > > Let me know what you think, > > > > Moritz