RE: Maintenance of Linux FPGA

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Xu, Yilun <yilun.xu@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Sunday, September 26, 2021 1:45 PM
> To: Moritz Fischer <mdf@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: linux-fpga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Wu, Hao
> <hao.wu@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: Maintenance of Linux FPGA
> 
> On Sat, Sep 25, 2021 at 11:39:23AM -0700, Moritz Fischer wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I lately did not have enough time to dedicate to the Linux FPGA
> > subsystem, concerns were raised around bus-factor and all.
> >
> > Looking at my day-job I don't see this getting better in the short-term
> > so I've decided to get a conversation going on how to structure this
> > better for the benefit of the Linux FPGA subsystem.
> >
> > Maybe a maintainer team approach would address the bus factor and
> > workload concerns better?
> >
> > In terms of people I was thinking about:
> >
> > Hao has done a great job at keeping the DFL part of things going, so I
> > think he'd be a great choice.
> >
> > Yilun has been very helpful with reviews and I think he'd be a good
> > pick, too.
> 
> It's my pleasure for the nomination and yes I'd like to be one of the
> maintainer team, to be more helpful.

Hi Moritz,

Me too, it's really a great pleasure. Thanks a lot for giving me this
opportunity, I hope I can do more contributions.

Thanks
Hao

> 
> Thanks,
> Yilun
> 
> >
> > In terms of how to structure this: I'm not sure just yet, open to input.
> >
> > How do other multi-maintainer subsystems operate? Ideas? Suggestions?
> >
> > Let me know what you think,
> >
> > Moritz




[Index of Archives]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux