On 9/24/21 7:53 AM, Xu Yilun wrote: > On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 05:10:56PM -0700, Russ Weight wrote: >> Extend the FPGA Image Load framework to include a cancel IOCTL that can be >> used to request that an image upload be canceled. The IOCTL may return >> EBUSY if it cannot be canceled by software or ENODEV if there is no update >> in progress. >> >> Signed-off-by: Russ Weight <russell.h.weight@xxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> v16: >> - This was previously patch 6/6 >> - Amend fpga_image_load_release() to request cancellation of an ongoing >> update when possible. >> v15: >> - Compare to previous patch: >> [PATCH v14 6/6] fpga: sec-mgr: enable cancel of secure update >> - Changed file, symbol, and config names to reflect the new driver name >> - Cancel is now initiated by IOCT instead of sysfs >> - Removed signed-off/reviewed-by tags >> v14: >> - Updated ABI documentation date and kernel version >> v13: >> - No change >> v12: >> - Updated Date and KernelVersion fields in ABI documentation >> v11: >> - No change >> v10: >> - Rebased to 5.12-rc2 next >> - Updated Date and KernelVersion in ABI documentation >> v9: >> - Updated Date and KernelVersion in ABI documentation >> v8: >> - No change >> v7: >> - Changed Date in documentation file to December 2020 >> v6: >> - No change >> v5: >> - No change >> v4: >> - Changed from "Intel FPGA Security Manager" to FPGA Security Manager" >> and removed unnecessary references to "Intel". >> - Changed: iops -> sops, imgr -> smgr, IFPGA_ -> FPGA_, ifpga_ to fpga_ >> v3: >> - No change >> v2: >> - Bumped documentation date and version >> - Minor code cleanup per review comments >> --- >> Documentation/fpga/fpga-image-load.rst | 6 ++++ >> drivers/fpga/fpga-image-load.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++--- >> include/linux/fpga/fpga-image-load.h | 1 + >> include/uapi/linux/fpga-image-load.h | 2 ++ >> 4 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/fpga/fpga-image-load.rst b/Documentation/fpga/fpga-image-load.rst >> index 572e18afebb9..21fa85f18680 100644 >> --- a/Documentation/fpga/fpga-image-load.rst >> +++ b/Documentation/fpga/fpga-image-load.rst >> @@ -40,3 +40,9 @@ FPGA_IMAGE_LOAD_STATUS: >> Collect status for an on-going image upload. The status returned includes >> how much data remains to be transferred, the progress of the image load, >> and error information in the case of a failure. >> + >> +FPGA_IMAGE_LOAD_CANCEL: >> + >> +Request that a on-going image upload be cancelled. This IOCTL may return > an I'll fix it >> +EBUSY if it cannot be cancelled by software or ENODEV if there is no update > -EBUSY -ENODEV >From the userspace perspective, these are seen as positive errno numbers. I think this is OK as is? If not, I need to change it in other places as well. > >> +in progress. >> diff --git a/drivers/fpga/fpga-image-load.c b/drivers/fpga/fpga-image-load.c >> index 2e9a5a041535..a95d18077d58 100644 >> --- a/drivers/fpga/fpga-image-load.c >> +++ b/drivers/fpga/fpga-image-load.c >> @@ -46,6 +46,24 @@ static void fpga_image_dev_error(struct fpga_image_load *imgld, u32 err_code) >> imgld->ops->cancel(imgld); >> } >> >> +static int fpga_image_prog_transition(struct fpga_image_load *imgld, >> + u32 new_progress) >> +{ >> + int ret = 0; >> + >> + mutex_lock(&imgld->lock); >> + if (imgld->request_cancel) { >> + imgld->err_progress = imgld->progress; >> + imgld->err_code = FPGA_IMAGE_ERR_CANCELED; >> + imgld->ops->cancel(imgld); > We could only cancel in 2 conditions. > This is the first one: on progress transition. > >> + ret = -ECANCELED; >> + } else { >> + imgld->progress = new_progress; >> + } >> + mutex_unlock(&imgld->lock); >> + return ret; >> +} >> + >> static void fpga_image_prog_complete(struct fpga_image_load *imgld) >> { >> mutex_lock(&imgld->lock); >> @@ -79,8 +97,10 @@ static void fpga_image_do_load(struct work_struct *work) >> goto modput_exit; >> } >> >> - fpga_image_update_progress(imgld, FPGA_IMAGE_PROG_WRITING); >> - while (imgld->remaining_size) { >> + if (fpga_image_prog_transition(imgld, FPGA_IMAGE_PROG_WRITING)) >> + goto done; >> + >> + while (imgld->remaining_size && !imgld->request_cancel) { > This is the second condition: when we finished a block write. But if the > low level driver accepts the whole block size, we cannot cancel in > between. > > Actually the framework doesn't know when to successfully cancel an > update. It depends on the hardware. > > So maybe the framework just calls cancel() immediately in IOCTL, > let the low level driver decides if it is feasible and how to cancel. Yes - I agree. This current implementation assumes too much about the low-level driver. I have some ideas to try in the next patchset. Thanks, - Russ > > Thanks, > Yilun > >> /* >> * The write_blk() op has the option to use the blk_size >> * value provided here, or to modify it to something more >> @@ -105,7 +125,9 @@ static void fpga_image_do_load(struct work_struct *work) >> cond_resched(); >> } >> >> - fpga_image_update_progress(imgld, FPGA_IMAGE_PROG_PROGRAMMING); >> + if (fpga_image_prog_transition(imgld, FPGA_IMAGE_PROG_PROGRAMMING)) >> + goto done; >> + >> ret = imgld->ops->poll_complete(imgld); >> if (ret != FPGA_IMAGE_ERR_NONE) >> fpga_image_dev_error(imgld, ret); >> @@ -178,8 +200,8 @@ static int fpga_image_load_ioctl_write(struct fpga_image_load *imgld, >> imgld->remaining_size = wb.size; >> imgld->err_code = FPGA_IMAGE_ERR_NONE; >> imgld->progress = FPGA_IMAGE_PROG_STARTING; >> + imgld->request_cancel = false; >> queue_work(system_unbound_wq, &imgld->work); >> - >> return 0; >> >> exit_free: >> @@ -208,7 +230,7 @@ static long fpga_image_load_ioctl(struct file *filp, unsigned int cmd, >> unsigned long arg) >> { >> struct fpga_image_load *imgld = filp->private_data; >> - int ret = -ENOTTY; >> + int ret = 0; >> >> mutex_lock(&imgld->lock); >> >> @@ -219,6 +241,17 @@ static long fpga_image_load_ioctl(struct file *filp, unsigned int cmd, >> case FPGA_IMAGE_LOAD_STATUS: >> ret = fpga_image_load_ioctl_status(imgld, arg); >> break; >> + case FPGA_IMAGE_LOAD_CANCEL: >> + if (imgld->progress == FPGA_IMAGE_PROG_PROGRAMMING) >> + ret = -EBUSY; >> + else if (imgld->progress == FPGA_IMAGE_PROG_IDLE) >> + ret = -ENODEV; >> + else >> + imgld->request_cancel = true; >> + break; >> + default: >> + ret = -ENOTTY; >> + break; >> } >> >> mutex_unlock(&imgld->lock); >> @@ -249,6 +282,9 @@ static int fpga_image_load_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp) >> goto close_exit; >> } >> >> + if (imgld->progress != FPGA_IMAGE_PROG_PROGRAMMING) >> + imgld->request_cancel = true; >> + >> mutex_unlock(&imgld->lock); >> flush_work(&imgld->work); >> >> @@ -363,6 +399,9 @@ void fpga_image_load_unregister(struct fpga_image_load *imgld) >> goto unregister; >> } >> >> + if (imgld->progress != FPGA_IMAGE_PROG_PROGRAMMING) >> + imgld->request_cancel = true; >> + >> mutex_unlock(&imgld->lock); >> flush_work(&imgld->work); >> >> diff --git a/include/linux/fpga/fpga-image-load.h b/include/linux/fpga/fpga-image-load.h >> index 8b58365893fc..8ba39d3299d9 100644 >> --- a/include/linux/fpga/fpga-image-load.h >> +++ b/include/linux/fpga/fpga-image-load.h >> @@ -53,6 +53,7 @@ struct fpga_image_load { >> u32 progress; >> u32 err_progress; /* progress at time of error */ >> u32 err_code; /* image load error code */ >> + bool request_cancel; >> bool driver_unload; >> struct eventfd_ctx *finished; >> void *priv; >> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/fpga-image-load.h b/include/uapi/linux/fpga-image-load.h >> index dc0c9f1d78b1..da8a7452c29a 100644 >> --- a/include/uapi/linux/fpga-image-load.h >> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/fpga-image-load.h >> @@ -70,4 +70,6 @@ struct fpga_image_status { >> >> #define FPGA_IMAGE_LOAD_STATUS _IOR(FPGA_IMAGE_LOAD_MAGIC, 1, struct fpga_image_status) >> >> +#define FPGA_IMAGE_LOAD_CANCEL _IO(FPGA_IMAGE_LOAD_MAGIC, 2) >> + >> #endif /* _UAPI_LINUX_FPGA_IMAGE_LOAD_H */ >> -- >> 2.25.1