Hi Anatolij, On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 03:42:22PM +0100, Anatolij Gustschin wrote: > Currently we have the same FPGA manager name for all registered > xlnx-slave-spi managers, so it is not clear which fpga manager > index belongs to which configuration interface (SPI slave device). > Use unique fpga manager name for each registered manager. With > this change we have names with SPI slave device name encoded in > the manager name string, e.g. like "xlnx-slave-spi spi1.2". Sounds like a udev problem that can be solved by looking at the parent device? Cheers, Moritz
