On Thu, Feb 08, 2024 at 05:39:46PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote: > On Thu, 08 Feb 2024, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 08, 2024 at 11:34:25AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote: > > > On Thu, 01 Feb 2024, Andy Shevchenko wrote: ... > > > > backlight: mp3309c: Utilise temporary variable for struct device > > > > (1) > > > > > Set no longer applies. Please rebase, thanks. > > > > I got a contradictory messages: > > 1) email that says that all had been applied; > > 2) this email (that tells the complete opposite); > > 3) the repository where the first two were applied. > > > > While you can amend your scripts, I think I need to rebase only the last patch > > This is what I assume happened: > > 1. Attempted to apply the set (as a set) > 2. 2 commits applied cleanly > 3. The final commit conflicted Which is really strange. I have just applied (with b4) on top of your changes and no complains so far. $ git am ./v2_20240201_andriy_shevchenko_backlight_mp3309c_allow_to_use_on_non_of_platforms.mbx Applying: backlight: mp3309c: Make use of device properties Applying: backlight: mp3309c: use dev_err_probe() instead of dev_err() Applying: backlight: mp3309c: Utilise temporary variable for struct device Can you show what b4 tells you about this? > 4. I sent you a message to say that the set failed to apply > 5. *** I forgot to remove the 2 successful patches *** > 6. I applied another patch > 7. b4 noticed the 2 patches that were applied and thanked you for them > 8. *** I didn't notice that those tys were sent *** > > No need to update the scripts. :) > > > (1) that may not be found in your tree currently. > > I'm going to remove the other ones now. Please submit the set. I'll do, but I want to understand better what's going on. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
