Re: [PATCH] staging: sm750fb: Potential uninitialized field in "pll"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Sorry about that, let me resend it .

On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 2:53 AM Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 09:38:08PM -0700, Yizhuo wrote:
> > Inside function set_chip_clock(), struct pll is supposed to be
> > initialized in sm750_calc_pll_value(), if condition
> > "diff < mini_diff" in sm750_calc_pll_value() cannot be fulfilled,
> > then some field of pll will not be initialized but used in
> > function sm750_format_pll_reg(), which is potentially unsafe.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yizhuo <yzhai003@xxxxxxx>
>
> The patch is correct, but it doesn't apply to linux-next any more.  Can
> you re-write it on top of the most recent staging-next and resend?
>
> regards,
> dan carpenter
>


-- 
Kind Regards,

Yizhuo Zhai

Computer Science, Graduate Student
University of California, Riverside



[Index of Archives]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Tourism]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux