> >> On 02/12/2019 09:42 AM, Lee Jones wrote: > >>> On Fri, 08 Feb 2019, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > >>> > >>>> > >>>> On 01/17/2019 05:19 PM, Daniel Thompson wrote: > >>>>> On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 04:33:35PM +0300, Alexander Shiyan wrote: > >>>>>> We have two *_CLASS_DEVICE kernel config options (LCD_CLASS_DEVICE > >>>>>> and BACKLIGHT_LCD_DEVICE) that do the same job. > >>>>>> The patch removes useless BACKLIGHT_LCD_SUPPORT option > >>>>>> and converts LCD_CLASS_DEVICE into a menu. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@xxxxxxx> > >>>>> > >>>>> A cover letter with the v1 -> v2 changelog would be nice... but > >>>>> nevertheless: > >>>>> Acked-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@xxxxxxxxxx> > >>>> > >>>> Also: > >>>> > >>>> Acked-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@xxxxxxxxxxx> > >>>> > >>>> Lee, will you pick this up or do you want me to do it? > >>> > >>> You can take them if you want. I will require a pull-request from an > >>> independent immutable branch though please. > >> > >> OK, immutable branch will also allow other trees (drm) to sync with > >> these changes if desired. > >> > >> I will do it for v5.2 if you are fine with it (too late for v5.1 > >> IMHO and I also won't have time too fix any potential issues next > >> week). > > Topic branch for these 2 simple patches seems like serious overkill. [...] > > Would be good to get it into 5.1 still though, just to avoid too > > many conflicts. I think you just answered your own statement. :) > Well, if so I'm also fine with this going in 5.1 w/o topic branch. > > Lee, do you want to merge this directly into backlight tree (you > have now both fbdev and drm acks)? It was too late for v5.1. Do you still want to take this for v5.2, or should I take them and provide you with an immutable pull-request? -- Lee Jones [李琼斯] Linaro Services Technical Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
