On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 09:42:48PM +0200, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
> The Toppoly panels have a global reset line. Add an optional gpio
> control for this line, for platforms which have the ability to drive it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/video/backlight/tdo24m.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/video/backlight/tdo24m.c b/drivers/video/backlight/tdo24m.c
> index e4bd63e9db6b..e4b2dfabf192 100644
> --- a/drivers/video/backlight/tdo24m.c
> +++ b/drivers/video/backlight/tdo24m.c
> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
> */
>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
> #include <linux/kernel.h>
> #include <linux/init.h>
> #include <linux/device.h>
> @@ -32,6 +33,7 @@ struct tdo24m {
> struct spi_message msg;
> struct spi_transfer xfer;
> uint8_t *buf;
> + struct gpio_desc *xres;
Why do we need a write-only variable?
> int (*adj_mode)(struct tdo24m *lcd, int mode);
> int color_invert;
> @@ -364,6 +366,7 @@ static int tdo24m_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
> if (lcd->buf == NULL)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> + lcd->xres = devm_gpiod_get(&spi->dev, "reset", GPIOD_OUT_LOW);
devm_gpiod_get_optional() would be better, if only for its commenting
value.
Also, this adds a new optional property, doesn't the devicetree binding
docs need to be update to match this?
Daniel.
> m = &lcd->msg;
> x = &lcd->xfer;
>
> --
> 2.11.0
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fbdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
