>>> On 07.07.16 at 11:42, <JGross@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 07/07/16 09:48, Jan Beulich wrote: >> Only a positive return value indicates success. > > Hmm, I'm not convinced on this change (and the similar others as > well). From xenbus.h: > > /* Single read and scanf: returns -errno or num scanned if > 0. */ > > There should be no case for xenbus_scanf() returning 0. And looking > into the functions proofs this is correct. I don't think it is appropriate for callers to assume a currently impossible return value indicates success. Jan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fbdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
