On 05/03/16 18:57, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 5:47 PM, Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@xxxxxx> wrote: > >> Although one thing to consider is that if there is ever going to be a >> DRM driver for CLCD, it would be good to have the device tree parts >> correctly representing the hardware, so that the DRM driver could be >> implemented in a cleaner, more generic way. > > OK so for the next kernel cycle I can work on that. > > The non-controversial patch set is essentially just using the DT bindings Yes, I think the non-controversial series is fine. Will you be sending a v2 of that series? > that are already in the kernel and in widespread use. See: > commit d10715be03bd8bad59ddc50236cb140c3bd73c7b > "video: ARM CLCD: Add DT support" > > They follow the example set by > commit 478a4f81af4936c683a03488e15b087e28cb4f0d > "ARM: vexpress: Add CLCD Device Tree properties" This one not actually correct, as the panel node is inside the clcd node. The child parent relationship should represent a control bus. But that's a different topic... Tomi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
