On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 01:19:12PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote: > Hi Thierry, > > On Mon, 5 Oct 2015 11:35:43 +0200 > Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 10:00:22AM +0200, Nicolas Ferre wrote: > > > Le 30/09/2015 21:29, Robert Jarzmik a écrit : > > > > Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@xxxxxxx> writes: > > > > > > > >> This reverts commit 68feaca0b13e453aa14ee064c1736202b48b342f. > > > >> This commit breaks legacy platforms, for which : > > > >> (a) no pwm table is added (legacy platforms) > > > >> (b) in this case, in pwm_get(), pmw_lookup_list is empty, and therefore > > > >> chosen == NULL, and therefore pwm_get() returns NULL, and pwm_get() > > > >> returns -EPROBE_DEFER > > > >> (c) as a consequence, this code is unreachable in pwm_bl.c : > > > >> if (IS_ERR(pb->pwm)) { > > > >> ret = PTR_ERR(pb->pwm); > > > >> dev_info(&pdev->dev, "%s:%d(): %d\n", __func__, __LINE__, ret); > > > >> if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER) > > > >> goto err_alloc; > > > >> > > > >> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "unable to request PWM, trying legacy API\n"); > > > >> pb->legacy = true; > > > >> pb->pwm = pwm_request(data->pwm_id, "pwm-backlight"); > > > >> > > > >> As this code is unreachable, all legacy platforms relying on pwm_id are > > > >> broken, amongst which pxa have been tested as broken. > > > >> > > > >> Signed-off-by: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@xxxxxxx> > > > > Thierry, would you have a look please ? > > > > As I said before, all legacy platform relying on pwm_id are broken. I'd like to > > > > be sure this lands in the next -rc series. > > > > > > Well, as I answered on the linux-pwm mailing-list (I was not in copy) here: > > > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.pwm/2744 > > > I wonder if it's not easier to fix the platforms and add the pwm tables... > > > > > > Otherwise, Boris proposed this fix: > > > 8<----------------------------------------------------------- > > > diff --git a/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c b/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c > > > index eff379b..00483d4 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c > > > +++ b/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c > > > @@ -273,15 +273,15 @@ static int pwm_backlight_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > > pb->pwm = devm_pwm_get(&pdev->dev, NULL); > > > if (IS_ERR(pb->pwm)) { > > > ret = PTR_ERR(pb->pwm); > > > - if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER) > > > - goto err_alloc; > > > > > > dev_err(&pdev->dev, "unable to request PWM, trying legacy API\n"); > > > pb->legacy = true; > > > pb->pwm = pwm_request(data->pwm_id, "pwm-backlight"); > > > if (IS_ERR(pb->pwm)) { > > > dev_err(&pdev->dev, "unable to request legacy PWM\n"); > > > - ret = PTR_ERR(pb->pwm); > > > + if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER) > > > + ret = PTR_ERR(pb->pwm); > > > + > > > goto err_alloc; > > > } > > > } > > > > > > which is not tested and may add an extra non-valid error log. > > > > This is a little risky in my opinion. Not only does it print two error > > messages for non-legacy platforms (that would be another regression if > > you want to be nit-picking), but it is subtly buggy. If you have a > > system with multiple PWM providers, you could end up failing the first > > pwm_get() with -EPROBE_DEFER but then continue to the legacy case, and > > this could succeed because data->pwm_id == 0, and that other provider > > could be exporting the PWM with this ID. If I remember correctly this > > was one of the reasons why the offending commit was merged in the first > > place. > > Just for the record, when I proposed this fix to Nicolas, I clearly > stated that this was not the way to go, and that fixing the offending > platforms to use PWM lookup table was the only sane solution, though I > didn't thought about the invalid PWM id case leading to buggy behavior. As chance would have it, this bubbled to the top of my inbox today: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/483993/ I think that conflicts with Nicolas' -EPROBE_DEFER patch, but I think reverting Nicolas' patch and then applying the above on top might fix this nicely for everybody. Thierry
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature