* Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@xxxxxxxx> > > S390 requires its own implementation of pcio_iomap*() calls > is because it has its "BAR spaces are not disjunctive on s390 > so we need the bar parameter of pci_iomap to find the corresponding > device and create the mapping cookie" -- in summary, it has its own > lookup/lock solution. > > It does not include asm-generic/pci_iomap.h > > Since it currenty maps ioremap_wc() to ioremap_nocache() and that's > the architecture default we can easily just map the wc calls to > the default calls as well. > > Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@xxxxxx> > Cc: linux-fbdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxx> > Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Reported-by: 0 day bot > Signed-off-by: Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@xxxxxxxx> > --- > > This broke through some series that went into Ingo's tip tree which > I added. As such I *think* this should go through Ingo's tip tree. > Let me know. Up to you guys. I fixed the changelog to explain all this. Also, is there any other architecture that got broken by: 1b3d4200c1e0 PCI: Add pci_iomap_wc() variants ? Thanks, Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fbdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
