Hi Mark, On Mon, 20 Jul 2015 18:19:50 +0100 Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 05:31:57PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote: > > > - dropped pwm-regulator patches (should be submitted separately) > > I think the second patch needs to go in with this series doesn't it? It > was just the enable one that was good to go immediately IIRC. I was planning on submitting those two patches after the PWM changes have been merged, but you're right, maybe we should think about a proper way to smoothly get all of them in the same release. I have rebased my work on top your regulator/topic/pwm branch containing Lee's work [1]. Note that patch 1 has changed a bit to take Lee's additions into account. Thierry, could you create a branch based on Mark's regulator/topic/pwm branch ? If everybody agrees on the solution I'll send a v3 rebasing my work on top of this topic branch. Best Regards, Boris [1]https://github.com/bbrezillon/linux-rk/tree/atomic-pwm-v3 -- Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fbdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
