Re: simple framebuffer slower by factor of 20, on socfpga (arm) platform

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> > The difference is probably caused by memcpy() vs memcpy_fromio(). The
> > comment above memcpy_fromio() says "This needs to be optimized". I think
> > generally speaking memcpy_fromio() is correct for a framebuffer.
> > 
> > That said, if the fb is in RAM, and is only written by the CPU, I think
> > a normal memcpy() for fb_memcpy_fromfb() should be fine...
> 
> Could memcpy() cause alignment traps here if the fb pointer is unaligned
> and uncached?

Original commit did not comment on any failure, so I expect that is
not a problem here...
									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fbdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Tourism]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux