Hi, On 09/30/2014 06:59 AM, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 05:57:18PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote: <snip> >> But sure, you can still try to point new issues, get an obvious and >> robust solution, and then discard the issue when the solution doesn't >> go your way... > > And you've already proven that you're completely unwilling to even > consider any other solution than what was originally proposed, so I > really don't see how discussing this further with you is going to be > productive. That is not true, we have seriously considered various other alternatives, as you know since you've participated in the discussion about them. And we've found them all lacking, mostly because they are 10 times as complicated. You've made your point that you don't like this solution quite loudly already, and we've all heard you. However you seem to be mostly alone in this. Even the clk maintainer has said that what we want to do is exactly how clocks are supposed to be used in dt. If you don't like this no-one is forcing you to use the clocks property in your own code. If it is not there, simplefb will behave exactly as before. Now since you're the only one very vocally against this, and a lot of people are in favor of this and have a need for this, can we please just get this merged and get this over with ? Regards, Hans -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fbdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
