On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 11:15:21PM +0200, Rickard Strandqvist wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/sis/init.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/sis/init.c
> index bd40f5e..9e2dd96 100644
> --- a/drivers/video/fbdev/sis/init.c
> +++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/sis/init.c
> @@ -355,12 +355,12 @@ SiS_GetModeID(int VGAEngine, unsigned int VBFlags, int HDisplay, int VDisplay,
> }
> break;
> case 400:
> - if((!(VBFlags & CRT1_LCDA)) || ((LCDwidth >= 800) && (LCDwidth >= 600))) {
> + if ((!(VBFlags & CRT1_LCDA)) || (LCDwidth >= 600)) {
It might be that this was supposed to be:
if((!(VBFlags & CRT1_LCDA)) || ((LCDwidth <= 800) && (LCDwidth >= 600))) {
But why would people write a range from high to low? That's crazy
people who write backwards code...
The second condition was supposed to do *something* although it's
unclear what. I would normally say that we should leave the static
checker warning here instead of guessing. Perhaps add a comment like
/* fixme: huh? What's with this nonsense condition? */ But in this
case it's all dead code because LCDwidth is always zero and the code
hasn't changed since 2.6.12 so I don't care.
regards,
dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fbdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
