On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 01:03:31PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > On Wed, 25 Jun 2014, Thierry Reding wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 10:54:47AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > > > > Make use of the new devm_gpiod_get_optional() to simplify the probe > > > > code. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > --- > > > > drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c | 7 ++----- > > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > > > > > Looks good. Applied, thanks. > > > > Technically pwm_bl.c is my turf. However I only adopted it way back when > > the backlight subsystem was orphaned, but it seems Jingoo, Bryan and you > > are taking good care of it these days, so perhaps it would be a good > > idea to move it back to your custody? > > Yeah, the whole 'driver maintainer' sketch could get pretty complex. > It's pretty clean-cut in the PWM subsystem as only one exists, but > Backlight and MFD have a whole bunch, and I don't usually wait for > them to Ack/Nack before applying or providing review comments. > > I'm happy to play it however you like really. I'm sure the boys and I > can handle it if you so wish. Even better if you would say in the > MAINTAINERS file and provide review comments when patches are > submitted. I do think all 'drivers/video/backlight' changes should go > in via the Backlight tree though. Okay, that works for me. Thierry
Attachment:
pgpfkCdwbqJwa.pgp
Description: PGP signature
