On 24/04/14 19:53, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: >> Right. I wonder what the name should be... "gpio" is out, as the name >> should be more specific. > > No, it's not out. The name should be "gpio@22", I think it would be > unique. > >> We already have gpio1-8, which are the gpio >> banks from the SoC. > > I don't understand why you are indexing the names while you probably > have the address part after @ that makes them unique already. Ah sorry for the confusion, I misunderstood. I was talking about the label, not the name, of the node. So the labels for the gpio banks are 'gpio2' etc. The names are 'gpio@123456' etc. And yes, here the name should be 'gpio@22' as you said. I didn't see any rules about the labels in the ePARP doc, so I guess 'tca6424a' would be a valid one. Maybe not a good one, though, especially if there are multiple tca6424a chips on the board (I need to check). Tomi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
