On 06/03/14 12:53, Daniel Mack wrote: > On 03/06/2014 11:30 AM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: >> On 06/03/14 12:18, Daniel Mack wrote: > >>>> That's clearly not the right place for it, but I >>>> think it's easier to move it along the other files, and later move it >>>> back to drivers/video/. >>> >>> Maybe it might be worth adding a subdirectory for hardware accelerators? >>> Because this is what the pxa3xx-gcu thing is all about really. And it's >>> only a tiny transport layer that passed commands between the hardware >>> block and a DirectFB userspace driver. >> >> Well, there's drivers/gpu/. It sounds like a good match, and by "sounds" >> I mean the word "gpu" sounds like a good match. I'm not sure if other >> people have opinions on what drivers/gpu/ should contain, though. I have applied this series to fbdev tree for 3.15. > Yes, you're right. Do you think we should do that in a 2nd step maybe, > after 3.15? Maybe. Then again, drivers/video is not so bad a location, after fbdev stuff has been moved to drivers/video/fbdev/. drivers/gpu doesn't seem to have a specific maintainer, but I guess that goes through drm maintainer. Tomi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
