On 16/09/13 13:33, Michal Simek wrote: > On 09/16/2013 11:51 AM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: >> On 12/09/13 08:54, Michal Simek wrote: >> >>> @@ -394,16 +382,12 @@ static int xilinxfb_release(struct device *dev) >>> /* Turn off the display */ >>> xilinx_fb_out32(drvdata, REG_CTRL, 0); >>> >>> - /* Release the resources, as allocated based on interface */ >>> - if (drvdata->flags & BUS_ACCESS_FLAG) >>> - devm_iounmap(dev, drvdata->regs); >>> #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_DCR >>> - else >>> + /* Release the resources, as allocated based on interface */ >>> + if (!(drvdata->flags & BUS_ACCESS_FLAG)) >>> dcr_unmap(drvdata->dcr_host, drvdata->dcr_len); >>> #endif >> >> I might be mistaken, and it's not strictly part of this series, but >> shouldn't dcr_unmap be called somewhere else also, if the probe fails? > > yes. It should. Do you want me to apply these patches as they are, or do you want to improve the series to include the dcr_unmap fix? Tomi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
