My comments inline. > -----Original Message----- > From: Tomi Valkeinen [mailto:tomi.valkeinen@xxxxxx] > Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2013 6:33 PM > To: Wang Huan-B18965 > Cc: plagnioj@xxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-fbdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm- > kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Jin Zhengxiong-R64188; Estevam Fabio-R49496; > shawn.guo@xxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] ARM: vf610: Add DCU framebuffer driver for > Vybrid VF610 platform > > Hi, > > On 03/09/13 11:21, Wang Huan-B18965 wrote: > > Hi, Jean-Christophe, Tomi, > > > > Could you please help to review these patches? > > Thanks! > > There seemed to be some strong opinions that there should be a drm > driver for this hardware, instead of an fb driver. So as there seems to > be disagreements about this, I'll leave this series to Jean-Christophe, > who's the primary maintainer. [Alison Wang] Thanks for Tomi's comments. I agree that we can implement the DRM driver for the DCU. As the bandwidth limitation, I suggest we use the fb driver firstly. On the other hand, the fb driver can meet the application requirement based on this SoC. We'll try to provide the DRM driver when this IP integrated into other SoC. Jean-Christophe, Do you have any comments. Thanks. Best Regards, Alison Wang ��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{����n�r������&��z�ޗ�zf���h���~����������_��+v���)ߣ�
