Hi David, On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 3:22 AM, David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > If we apply this patch it will get very hard to support this with a > KMS driver. So any reason why we cannot use the DRM FOURCC constants > instead? I don't see any. Maybe Stephen can confirm. > The dvbe proposal is available here: (also see the two following patches) > http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1302.2/00274.html > > it provides a simple DRM driver that uses VESA / VBE. I am currently > trying to rework it to "SimpleDRM" which can support arbitrary > firmware framebuffers. Ok. I am personally fine with using FOURCC codes for describing video modes. Maybe we can just drop this patch if it gets in your way. Alex. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fbdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
