2013/4/2 Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@xxxxxx>: > On 2013-04-02 07:50, Tony Prisk wrote: >> Now that a display timing binding is available, convert our almost identical >> binding to use the standard binding. >> >> This patch converts the vt8500 and wm8505 framebuffer drivers and >> associated dts/dtsi files to use the standard binding as defined in >> bindings/video/display-timing.txt. >> >> There are two side-effects of making this conversion: >> >> 1) The fb node should now be in the board file, rather than the soc file as >> the display-timing node is a child of the fb node. >> >> 2) We still require a bits per pixel property to initialize the framebuffer >> for the different lcd panels. Rather than including this as part of the >> display timing, it is moved into the framebuffer node. > > This means that the boards using the current DT bindings won't work with > a kernel with these patches, right? Is that ok? There are no known products shipping any DT-enabled firmware with these chips in the wild. The only way to run modern kernels on VIA/WonderMedia chips so far is by using the "appended DTB" workaround, and the instructions that have been posted to Wiki's and mailing list discussions imply that a fresh DTB is compiled from current kernel sources to produce a bootable image. Thus, it seems that this change should not really break anything major, as the user base is quite small and those who use new code are most likely to use new DTB as well. Best, Alexey -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fbdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
