> > I looked in today's linux-next, and there seems to be only one > > initialization of this field, to true, and one test of this field. So > > perhaps the case for setting the field to false just isn't needed. > > Oh sorry now I get what you mean! I thought about this -- and yes I > decided to not add a bool false setting for the structure field given > that the assumption is this would not be something dynamic, and data > structure would be kzalloc()'d so by default they are 0. What do you do about the test, though? julia -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fbdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
