On Wed, 13 Feb 2013 10:21:52 +0100 Anatolij Gustschin <agust@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 12 Feb 2013 17:01:55 -0800 > Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Tue, 12 Feb 2013 16:54:58 -0800 > > Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > Thanks, I queued both these with a plan to merge into 3.9-rc1. > > > > No I didn't. The patches have already found their way into linux-next > > via some other tree. > > Yes, via MPC5XXX tree. Since I didn't receive response from fbdev > maintainer I applied both patches in my powerpc MPC5XXX next branch > so that these can be exposed in linux-next at least. MPC5121 uses the > fsl-diu-fb driver, so these patches could go via MPC5XXX tree, but I > can't push them via my tree without an ACK from fbdev maintainer. The patches look OK to me - I suggest you go ahead and merge them up for 3.9-rc1. > > Without any -stable tags, either. You don't think we should fix the > > "24 and 16 bpp" thing in 3.8.x and earlier? > > I didn't add any -stable tags since my hope was that the patches > will go into v3.8 via fbdev tree. It would be good to fix the bpp > issue in 3.8.x. But the issue is not critical for earlier maintained > stable versions I think. Please remember to add the cc:stable to the changelogs if you want these in 3.8.x and earlier. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fbdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
