On 2012-11-30 12:02, Chandrabhanu Mahapatra wrote:
> On Thursday 29 November 2012 05:35 PM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
>>> diff --git a/drivers/video/omap2/dss/dss.h b/drivers/video/omap2/dss/dss.h
>>> index 84a7f6a..aa273d8 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/video/omap2/dss/dss.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/video/omap2/dss/dss.h
>>> @@ -143,6 +143,10 @@ struct reg_field {
>>> u8 low;
>>> };
>>>
>>> +struct register_field {
>>> + u8 start, end;
>>> +};
>>> +
>>
>> We already have the dss_reg_field struct. I think it's better to move
>> that to dss.h, and use it, instead of creating an exact duplicate.
>>
>> Tomi
>>
>>
>
> register_field appears to be a more generic a name rather than
> dss_reg_field. Also I was thinking to initialise
Yes, register_field is a more generic name, and that's one reason I
don't suggest using it. There's a possibility of name clash if some
common linux framework would use a similar name. So dss_reg_field refers
to a register field, used by (omap)dss.
It could also be renamed to omapdss_reg_field, but that's a bit longer.
But perhaps naming it omapdss_reg_field would separate it better from
dss_reg_fields.
Tomi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
