* Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@xxxxxx> [120807 03:57]: > On Tue, 2012-08-07 at 13:27 +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Yes, they can be overridden, but I think it's still quite difficult to > > > manage. DSS is modeled with multiple blocks, also in DT data. So you'd > > > need to override multiple entries. > > > > > > And it'd also require a new dts file for each version of your board with > > > different ES version. > > > > > > Also, I don't really see why this information would need to be present > > > in the DT data (especially as it's not simple). It's all trivially found > > > out in the code, by using cpu_is & soc_is. > > > > Fair enough. I just think we should remove all cpu_is_* and soc_is_* > > from drivers. > > I agree, that's part of the idea here. Instead of having cpu_is checks > all around, we'll have them in only certain centralized places. Then > it's easier to implement a way to move them totally out of the driver, > when we come up with a good idea how to accomplish that. Yes limiting them to driver init and setting some driver specific flags based on that is a good start. But eventually no drivers should have those checks. Regards, Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fbdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
