On 31/07/12 04:45 AM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > On Thu, 2012-07-19 at 16:04 -0400, Raphael Assenat wrote: >> On our AM3505 based board, dpi.c complains that there is no VDSS_DSI regulator >> and the framebuffer cannot be enabled. However, this check does not seem to >> apply to AM3505/17 chips. >> >> I am not the first facing this issue, see this thread from Nov. 2011: >> http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=132147745930213&w=2 >> >> The string 'vdds_dsi' does appear once in the technical reference manual[1] >> but there is no corresponding power pin on the package[2]. I failed to >> locate any signal that could be an equivalent. I am trying to obtain some >> clarifications on TI's forum[3]... >> >> In any case, I am currently running with the patch below. In order to keep >> cpu_is_xx uses to a minimum, I check for am35xx once at init time and allow >> dpi.vdds_dsi_reg to be NULL from then on, getting rid of all the other >> cpu_is_omap34xx uses in the process. >> >> Your comments would be appreciated. Please also consider for merging. > > VDDS_DSI is used to power up some of the DSS pins on OMAP3. I don't know > why the HW was designed like that... If you have a correct image without > the power, then obviously it's not needed. Yes, I confirm the image is displayed properly. > We don't currently deal with AM3xxx SoCs in any way in the driver. It's > difficult enough trying to handle just OMAP DSS versions, and now we > need to add AM3xxx to the mix. Sigh =). > > However, I don't want to apply this patch, as we're trying to remove the > cpu_is checks (soc_is goes in the same category). > > I guess we need to add entries for the AM3xxx SoCs in the > dss_features.c. > > Any idea what other differences AM3xxx has compared to OMAP3? This is the only one I am aware of. Best regards, Raphaël Assénat -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fbdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
