On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 15:32, Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sat, 2012-01-21 at 14:13 +0000, Florian Tobias Schandinat wrote: >> On 01/21/2012 01:57 PM, Kay Sievers wrote: > >> > That's true. If one calls the current _unregister() *before* calling >> > _unlink(), the _unlink() is a NOP. But that's intentional. >> >> I don't think you got me right. My complaint was that after your patch >> do_unregister_framebuffer itself calls unlink_framebuffer _after_ it set >> registered_fb[i] = NULL; >> So for any framebuffer that does not call unlink_framebuffer directly the line >> device_destroy(fb_class, MKDEV(FB_MAJOR, i)); >> will no longer be executed. Do you agree? > > Yes, I absolutely agree. :) Hey Florian, any updates? We like to get that into the Fedora kernel, as we promised out-of-the-box multi-seat hotplug support, but the framebuffer events are broken at the moment. It would be nice if it would show up in -next somehow, and gets testing, so I don't need to convince anybody at the Fedora kernel side, that this will land upstream ... Thanks, Kay -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fbdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
