Re: Future desktop on dumb frame buffers?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 21 March 2011 20:25, Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 19:19:43 +0000
> timofonic timofonic <timofonic@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> So if KMS is so cool and provides many advantages over fbdev and
>> such... Why isn't more widely used intead of still relying on fbdev?
>> Why still using fbdev emulation (that is partial and somewhat broken,
>> it seems) instead using KMS directly?
>
> Used by what? ÂAll three major GPU device classes have KMS support
> (Intel, ATI, and nVidia). ÂIf you want it for a particular device, you
> can always port it over.
>
> As for fbdev emulation, what's still using it? ÂThere's nothing
> stopping projects from converting over; X and Wayland can already
> handle KMS APIs just fine.

The console and a few terminal emulators for it I guess.

Thanks

Michal
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fbdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Tourism]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux