On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 10:28 AM, Timur Tabi <timur@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Grant Likely wrote: >> No. It is a static property of the board/machine. It is expected it >> to be encoded into the board's .dts file. > > Ok, but that only makes sense if the monitor is hard-wired to the board itself. > If a user can attach any monitor he wants, then the EDID data can't be known at > compile time. > > I guess it's no different than using hard-coded memory controller programming > instead of SPD. You can safely avoid SPD only if the DDR chips are soldered on > the board. Correct, if a real EDID i2c channel exists, then an edid property should *not* be specified in the device tree. g. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fbdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
