oops, sorry. it changed header file name to another. 2010/7/3 InKi Dae <daeinki@xxxxxxxxx>: > Hi, Jaya. > > below is my answer. > > 2010/7/3 Jaya Kumar <jayakumar.lkml@xxxxxxxxx>: >> Hi InKi, >> >> 2010/7/2 InKi Dae <inki.dae@xxxxxxxxxxx>: >>> this patch addes MIPI-DSI Driver. >>> >>> to use this driver, some structures below should be added to machine >>> specific file. >> >> A quick question. I'm having difficulty understanding the larger >> picture here. There's the MIPI-DSI host controller driver (which I >> think is what this patch is) which is specific to this platform. Then >> there's the MIPI-DSI LCD panels which are supposed to be fully >> platform independent, right? and would thus ideally have a platform >> independent MIPI-DSI client driver? >> > > hmm, is there any mipi-dsi master framework that it can use commonly > in linux kernel? my driver is dependent on platform a little because > lcd panel driver should include two header files. > >> Would I be correct in saying this patch below does not provide such an >> abstraction and so structures that would be necessary for such a >> display driver (eg: struct mipi_lcd_driver ) appear to be declared in >> the samsung platform specific files. In other words, if we wanted to >> support a particular MIPI-DSI LCD panel, it would require a client >> driver that is tied intimately to this platform? >> >> Could you point us to an example mipi-dsi client driver that is using >> the patch you provided? ie: something that is calling >> s5p_dsim_register_lcd_driver. That would help us understand the >> abstraction that is being made here. > > Ok, below is example code to mipi-dsi based lcd panel driver. > > #include <plat/dsim.h> > #include <plat/mipi_ddi.h> > > static struct mipi_lcd_driver xxx_mipi_driver = { > .name = "xxx", > .init = xxx_init, > .display_on = xxx_displsy_on, > .set_link = xxx_set_link, > .probe = xxx_probe, > .suspend = xxx_suspend, > .resume = xxx_resume, > }; > > static int xxx_init(void) > { > s5p_dsim_register_lcd_driver(&xxx_mipi_driver); > return 0; > } > > static void xxx_exit(void) > { > return; > } > > module_init(xxx_init); > module_exit(xxx_exit); > > at module_init, xxx_mipi_driver would be registered to mipi master > driver through > s5p_dsim_register_lcd_driver func and when master driver is probed, xxx_probe > would be called by probe func of master driver. > > I wonder there is mipi-dsi master driver indenpendent on platform > fully in linux kernel. > if exsiting, I will use it as master driver. of course, the part > dependent on platform > would be implemented using that framework. > > Thank you. > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fbdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html