Re: [PATCH 10/11] viafb: rework the I2C support in the VIA framebuffer driver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Florian Tobias Schandinat schrieb:
Jonathan Corbet schrieb:
On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 00:40:39 +0200
Florian Tobias Schandinat <FlorianSchandinat@xxxxxx> wrote:
Meanwhile, I'm a little unsure now...is there an action item for me
with regard to the i2c code?  I've been staring at it since your last
note, but I couldn't find any obvious problems.  I do have to say that
Harald's rework is far cleaner than what came before...

Well the main question is probably:
How does it change the behaviour towards the hardware?
I tend to think that OLPC might not be the only ones who did something weird with it....and we already know that we shouldn't trust the documentation too much.

I was able to narrow this issue down to the fourth bus. So with
if (i == 4)
	continue;
in the bus creation loop I'm able to get a working framebuffer which does not have the issues mentioned. Any ideas what should be done now?


Thanks,

Florian Tobias Schandinat

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fbdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Tourism]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux