On Thu, 2010-02-04 at 15:40 +0100, ext Janusz Krzysztofik wrote: > Thursday 04 February 2010 10:58:12 Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Wed, 2010-02-03 at 17:21 +0100, ext Janusz Krzysztofik wrote: > > > Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2010-01-14 at 21:25 +0100, ext Janusz Krzysztofik wrote: > > > >> Support for RGB444 (12-bit) pixel format has been introduced into > > > >> omapfb/lcdc by Mark Underwood on 2006-05-26 (commit > > > >> f74edb6668aad9fc8e81585861b18f996c78a574) in preparation for Amstrad > > > >> Delta (E3) videophone LCD display support. > > > > > > > > I haven't seen any comments on this. Shall I apply it to my tree? > > > > > > > > Tomi > > > > > > Tomi, > > > > > > I'm not sure if I am the right person to decide whether my patch should > > > be accepted or not and what tree it should be applied to, but if you are > > > willing to take it than I'm happy. > > > > > > BTW, could you also consider taking my other long waiting patch that > > > touches drivers/video/omap: http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/66649/ ? > > > > Your patch was marked as RFC, so I thought it wasn't the final version. > > Tomi, > > Thanks for your explanation. It looks like I might not understand exactly how > a patch with an RFC tag is supposed to be processed. Can I assmue that next > time, when there are no comments to my RFC, I should just resubmit without > RFC tag? I don't know if there's any rule for it, I'm just speaking for myself. I've used RFC when my patch is still under development, but I'm interested in other people's comments. Tomi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fbdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
