On 2024/12/25 4:27, Kemeng Shi wrote:
> Rename stale journal_clear_revoked_flag to jbd2_clear_buffer_revoked_flags.
> Rename stale journal_switch_revoke to jbd2_journal_switch_revoke_table.
> Rename stale __journal_file_buffer to __jbd2_journal_file_buffer.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/jbd2/revoke.c | 8 ++++----
> fs/jbd2/transaction.c | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/jbd2/revoke.c b/fs/jbd2/revoke.c
> index af0208ed3619..5b7350109c5a 100644
> --- a/fs/jbd2/revoke.c
> +++ b/fs/jbd2/revoke.c
> @@ -474,7 +474,7 @@ void jbd2_journal_cancel_revoke(handle_t *handle, struct journal_head *jh)
> }
>
> /*
> - * journal_clear_revoked_flag clears revoked flag of buffers in
> + * jbd2_clear_buffer_revoked_flags clears revoked flag of buffers in
> * revoke table to reflect there is no revoked buffers in the next
> * transaction which is going to be started.
> */
> @@ -503,9 +503,9 @@ void jbd2_clear_buffer_revoked_flags(journal_t *journal)
> }
> }
>
> -/* journal_switch_revoke table select j_revoke for next transaction
> - * we do not want to suspend any processing until all revokes are
> - * written -bzzz
> +/* jbd2_journal_switch_revoke_table table select j_revoke for next
> + * transaction we do not want to suspend any processing until all
> + * revokes are written -bzzz
> */
> void jbd2_journal_switch_revoke_table(journal_t *journal)
> {
> diff --git a/fs/jbd2/transaction.c b/fs/jbd2/transaction.c
> index e00b87635512..908baf73b188 100644
> --- a/fs/jbd2/transaction.c
> +++ b/fs/jbd2/transaction.c
> @@ -2191,7 +2191,7 @@ static int __dispose_buffer(struct journal_head *jh, transaction_t *transaction)
> /*
> * We don't want to write the buffer anymore, clear the
> * bit so that we don't confuse checks in
> - * __journal_file_buffer
> + * __jbd2_journal_file_buffer
> */
> clear_buffer_dirty(bh);
> __jbd2_journal_file_buffer(jh, transaction, BJ_Forget);
