On Mon, 16 Dec 2024 11:55:30 +1100 Alistair Popple <apopple@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > The remainder are more -mm focussed. However they do depend on the fs/dax > cleanups in the first half so the trick would be making sure Andrew only takes > them if the nvdimm.git changes have made it into -next. I'm happy with either > approach, so let me know if I should split the series or not. My inclination is to put it all into the nvdimm tree, with appropriate MM developer acks. But I'm having difficulty determining how practical that is because the v3 series is almost a month old so my test merging was quite ugly. Perhaps you could prepare a new-doesn't-need-to-be-final version for people to look at and to aid with this head-scratching?
