From: Shida Zhang <zhangshida@xxxxxxxxxx>
This kinda revert the commit 56d35a4cd13e("ext4: Fix dirtying of
journalled buffers in data=journal mode") made by Jan 14 years ago,
since the do_get_write_access() itself can deal with the extra
unexpected buf dirting things in a proper way now.
Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Shida Zhang <zhangshida@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/ext4/inode.c | 18 +-----------------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
index a28f279fd02f..2687bf451a25 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
@@ -1023,27 +1023,11 @@ static int ext4_dirty_journalled_data(handle_t *handle, struct buffer_head *bh)
int do_journal_get_write_access(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
struct buffer_head *bh)
{
- int dirty = buffer_dirty(bh);
- int ret;
-
if (!buffer_mapped(bh) || buffer_freed(bh))
return 0;
- /*
- * ext4_block_write_begin() could have dirtied some buffers. Clean
- * the dirty bit as jbd2_journal_get_write_access() could complain
- * otherwise about fs integrity issues. Setting of the dirty bit
- * by ext4_block_write_begin() isn't a real problem here as we clear
- * the bit before releasing a page lock and thus writeback cannot
- * ever write the buffer.
- */
- if (dirty)
- clear_buffer_dirty(bh);
BUFFER_TRACE(bh, "get write access");
- ret = ext4_journal_get_write_access(handle, inode->i_sb, bh,
+ return ext4_journal_get_write_access(handle, inode->i_sb, bh,
EXT4_JTR_NONE);
- if (!ret && dirty)
- ret = ext4_dirty_journalled_data(handle, bh);
- return ret;
}
int ext4_block_write_begin(handle_t *handle, struct folio *folio,
--
2.33.0
