Re: [PATCH] ext4: No need to continue when the number of entries is 1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: syzbot+ae688d469e36fb5138d0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Edward Adam Davis <eadavis@xxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: No need to continue when the number of entries is 1
From: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2024 11:00:10 -0400
Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@xxxxxxx>, adilger.kernel@xxxxxxxxx, linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, syzkaller-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <tencent_BE7AEE6C7C2D216CB8949CE8E6EE7ECC2C0A@qq.com>
References: <00000000000075a135061c0480d0@google.com> <tencent_BE7AEE6C7C2D216CB8949CE8E6EE7ECC2C0A@qq.com>

On Mon, 01 Jul 2024 22:25:03 +0800, Edward Adam Davis wrote:
> When the number of entries mapped is 1, there is no need to split it.
> 
> 

Applied, thanks!

[1/1] ext4: No need to continue when the number of entries is 1
      commit: b2b81e122b5616890ba6657adeb8aa5ca1f05fe2

Best regards,
-- 
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] ext4: No need to continue when the number of entries is 1
  - From: Baokun Li

References:
- [syzbot] [ext4?] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request in do_split
  - From: syzbot
- [PATCH] ext4: No need to continue when the number of entries is 1
  - From: Edward Adam Davis

Prev by Date: [PATCH v2 25/25] ext4: save unnecessary indentation in ext4_ext_create_new_leaf()
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v2] ext4: fix macro definition error of EXT4_DIRENT_HASH and EXT4_DIRENT_MINOR_HASH
Previous by thread: [PATCH] ext4: No need to continue when the number of entries is 1
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] ext4: No need to continue when the number of entries is 1
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Reiser Filesystem Development] [Ceph FS] [Kernel Newbies] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Linux FS] [Yosemite National Park] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper] [Linux Media]