Re: [PATCH 0/3] Add {init, exit}_sequence_fs() helper function

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi, Christoph

On 11/07/2024 16:26, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
Can we please stop this boilerplate code an instead our __init/__exit
sections to supper multiple entires per module.  This should be mostly
trivial, except that we'd probably want a single macro that has the
init and exit calls so that the order in the section is the same and
the unroll on failure can walk back form the given offset. e.g.
something like:

module_subinit(foo_bar_init, foo_bar_exit);
module_subinit(foo_bar2_init, foo_bar2_exit);


Thanks for your suggestion,  I re-implemented it using section mode,
and the new patch set [1] has been sent.

[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240723083239.41533-1-youling.tang@xxxxxxxxx/T/#md81aaefe0c1fef70a0592d1580cbbb10ec9989b0

Thanks,
Youling.




[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux