Re: [PATCH v6 03/10] ext4: mark inode dirty before grabbing i_data_sem in ext4_setattr

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed 29-05-24 01:19:56, Harshad Shirwadkar wrote:
> Mark inode dirty first and then grab i_data_sem in ext4_setattr().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Harshad Shirwadkar <harshadshirwadkar@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  fs/ext4/inode.c | 7 ++++---
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
> index aa6440992a55..61ffbdc2fb16 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
> @@ -5410,12 +5410,13 @@ int ext4_setattr(struct mnt_idmap *idmap, struct dentry *dentry,
>  					(attr->ia_size > 0 ? attr->ia_size - 1 : 0) >>
>  					inode->i_sb->s_blocksize_bits);
>  
> -			down_write(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_data_sem);
> -			old_disksize = EXT4_I(inode)->i_disksize;
> -			EXT4_I(inode)->i_disksize = attr->ia_size;
>  			rc = ext4_mark_inode_dirty(handle, inode);
>  			if (!error)
>  				error = rc;
> +			down_write(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_data_sem);
> +			old_disksize = EXT4_I(inode)->i_disksize;
> +			EXT4_I(inode)->i_disksize = attr->ia_size;
> +

This is wrong. ext4_mark_inode_dirty() will copy the data to on-disk
buffer. If you set i_disksize after ext4_mark_inode_dirty(), the change
will not get properly logged in the transaction.

What you rather need is calling ext4_mark_inode_dirty() after dropping
i_data_sem which should be completely fine.

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx>
SUSE Labs, CR




[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux