John Garry <john.g.garry@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: >>> >>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20240124142645.9334-1-john.g.garry@xxxxxxxxxx/__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!PqMMFBeUqdWwlm0AxVyI_Vr1HPajTQ6AG2_GwK_IrhBSa-Wnz4cc-1w0LEFyTXY9Q9gT0WwhxvXloSqnOHb6Btg$ >>> >>> and now this one. >>> >>> Can the two of you please co-ordinate your efforts and based your >>> filesysetm work off the same iomap infrastructure changes? >> >> Sure Dave, make sense. But we are cc'ing each other in this effort >> together so that we are aware of what is being worked upon. > > Just cc'ing is not enough. I was going to send my v2 for XFS/iomap > support today. I didn't announce that as I did not think that I had to. ok. Let me take care of this next time to avoid any overlapping change hitting the mailing list to avoid double reviews/competing changes from 2 people. Hopefully I can find you on xfs IRC channel in case if I would like to post anything in the related/overlapping area . My handle is riteshh. > Admittedly it will be effectively an RFC, as the forcealign feature (now > included) is not mature. But it's going to be a bit awkward to have 2x > overlapping series' sent to the list. > > FWIW, I think that it's better to send series based on top of other > series, rather than cherry-picking necessary parts of other series (when > posting) > Ok. Sure John. Make sense. Now that I understood what I am looking for in from iomap side of the changes, I can provide my review comments to your series, whenever you post them. Thanks for your feedback. -ritesh
