Re: [PATCH 10/13] procfs: make freeing proc_fs_info rcu-delayed

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/13] procfs: make freeing proc_fs_info rcu-delayed
From: Christian Brauner <brauner@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2024 13:31:02 +0100
Cc: linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-nfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-cifs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20240204021739.1157830-10-viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
References: <20240204021436.GH2087318@ZenIV> <20240204021739.1157830-1-viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> <20240204021739.1157830-10-viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

On Sun, Feb 04, 2024 at 02:17:36AM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> makes proc_pid_ns() safe from rcu pathwalk (put_pid_ns()
> is still synchronous, but that's not a problem - it does
> rcu-delay everything that needs to be)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---

Reviewed-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@xxxxxxxxxx>

References:
- [PATCHES] RCU pathwalk race fixes
  - From: Al Viro
- [PATCH 01/13] fs/super.c: don't drop ->s_user_ns until we free struct super_block itself
  - From: Al Viro
- [PATCH 10/13] procfs: make freeing proc_fs_info rcu-delayed
  - From: Al Viro

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 08/13] nfs: fix UAF on pathwalk running into umount
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 09/13] procfs: move dropping pde and pid from ->evict_inode() to ->free_inode()
Previous by thread: [PATCH 10/13] procfs: make freeing proc_fs_info rcu-delayed
Next by thread: [PATCH 12/13] cifs_get_link(): bail out in unsafe case
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Reiser Filesystem Development] [Ceph FS] [Kernel Newbies] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Linux FS] [Yosemite National Park] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper] [Linux Media]

Powered by Linux