On Wed, 2024-01-10 at 16:43 -0700, Andreas Dilger wrote: > > Hello Brian, long time no see! Hi Andreas. Indeed, it has been a while. :-) > I was wondering if this might be a case where e2fsck removed the > journal > on an ext4 filesystem, and then it wasn't recreated (e.g. if e2fsck > was > killed before it finished cleanly). > > However, looking at the features enabled on the filesystem, it > definitely > looks like this was originally formatted as ext4. I suspect you mean s/4/2/ above? > Many of these features can be enabled on an existing filesystem, like > has_journal (ext3/4 journal), extents (improved large file > allocation), > huge_file (> 2TB files), dir_nlink (> 32000 subdirs) if you want > them. > I _think_ uninit_bg (e2fsck skip unused metadata may) is included > here. > > Some cannot be enabled on an existing filesystem like flex_bg > (localized > metadata), and extra_isize (fast xattrs). > > Whether that is worthwhile for you to enable, or just > backup/reformat/sync > is up to you. Indeed. I did simply re-create and copy as suggested by the wiki entry. Cheers, b.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
