On Mon 18-12-23 22:18:12, Baokun Li wrote: > Otherwise operating on an incorrupted block bitmap can lead to all sorts > of unknown problems. > > Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@xxxxxxxxxx> I agree this is a safer option. Feel free to add: Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> Honza > --- > fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c > index d72b5e3c92ec..a95fa6e2b0f9 100644 > --- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c > +++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c > @@ -6757,6 +6757,9 @@ __releases(ext4_group_lock_ptr(sb, e4b->bd_group)) > bool set_trimmed = false; > void *bitmap; > > + if (unlikely(EXT4_MB_GRP_BBITMAP_CORRUPT(e4b->bd_info))) > + return 0; > + > bitmap = e4b->bd_bitmap; > if (start == 0 && max >= ext4_last_grp_cluster(sb, e4b->bd_group)) > set_trimmed = true; > -- > 2.31.1 > -- Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx> SUSE Labs, CR
