[RFC PATCH 12/18] iomap: don't increase i_size if it's not a write operation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@xxxxxxxxxx>

Increase i_size in iomap_zero_range() looks not needed, the caller
should handle it. Especially, when truncate partial block, we should
not increase i_size beyond the new EOF here. It dosn't affect xfs and
gfs2 now because they reset the new file size after zero out, it doesn't
matter that a brief increase in i_size. But it will affect ext4 because
it set file size before truncate, so avoid increasing if it's not a
write path.

Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 fs/iomap/buffered-io.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
index fd4d43bafd1b..3b9ba390dd1b 100644
--- a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
+++ b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
@@ -852,13 +852,13 @@ static size_t iomap_write_end(struct iomap_iter *iter, loff_t pos, size_t len,
 	 * cache.  It's up to the file system to write the updated size to disk,
 	 * preferably after I/O completion so that no stale data is exposed.
 	 */
-	if (pos + ret > old_size) {
+	if ((iter->flags & IOMAP_WRITE) && pos + ret > old_size) {
 		i_size_write(iter->inode, pos + ret);
 		iter->iomap.flags |= IOMAP_F_SIZE_CHANGED;
 	}
 	__iomap_put_folio(iter, pos, ret, folio);
 
-	if (old_size < pos)
+	if ((iter->flags & IOMAP_WRITE) && old_size < pos)
 		pagecache_isize_extended(iter->inode, old_size, pos);
 	if (ret < len)
 		iomap_write_failed(iter->inode, pos + ret, len - ret);
-- 
2.39.2





[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux