On Tue, 24 Oct 2023 12:03:18 +0200 Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon 23-10-23 23:26:08, Hugh Dickins wrote: > > Since mm-hotfixes-stable commit e509ad4d77e6 ("ext4: use bdev_getblk() to > > avoid memory reclaim in readahead path") rightly replaced GFP_NOFAIL > > allocations by GFP_NOWAIT allocations, I've occasionally been seeing > > "page allocation failure: order:0" warnings under load: all with > > ext4_sb_breadahead_unmovable() in the stack. I don't think those > > warnings are of any interest: suppress them with __GFP_NOWARN. > > > > Fixes: e509ad4d77e6 ("ext4: use bdev_getblk() to avoid memory reclaim in readahead path") > > Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Yeah, makes sense. Just the commit you mention isn't upstream yet so I'm > not sure whether the commit hash is stable. e509ad4d77e6 is actually in mm-stable so yes, the hash should be stable.