Re: [PATCH] fs: apply umask if POSIX ACL support is disabled

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Dave Kleikamp <dave.kleikamp@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs: apply umask if POSIX ACL support is disabled
From: Max Kellermann <max.kellermann@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2023 16:45:37 +0200
Cc: Xiubo Li <xiubli@xxxxxxxxxx>, Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@xxxxxxxxx>, Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx>, ceph-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, jfs-discussion@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <69dda7be-d7c8-401f-89f3-7a5ca5550e2f@oracle.com>
References: <20230919081900.1096840-1-max.kellermann@ionos.com> <69dda7be-d7c8-401f-89f3-7a5ca5550e2f@oracle.com>

On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 5:32 PM Dave Kleikamp <dave.kleikamp@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I think this is sane, but the patch needs a description of why this is
> necessary for these specific file systems.

Indeed the patch description was lacking, sorry. I sent v2 with a
better description.

Max

References:
- [PATCH] fs: apply umask if POSIX ACL support is disabled
  - From: Max Kellermann
- Re: [PATCH] fs: apply umask if POSIX ACL support is disabled
  - From: Dave Kleikamp

Prev by Date: [PATCH v2] fs/{posix_acl,ext2,jfs,ceph}: apply umask if ACL support is disabled
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v2 00/89] fs: new accessor methods for inode atime and mtime
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v2] fs/{posix_acl,ext2,jfs,ceph}: apply umask if ACL support is disabled
Next by thread: [PATCH 1/7] [v2] lib: move jfs_user.h into libsupport
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Reiser Filesystem Development] [Ceph FS] [Kernel Newbies] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Linux FS] [Yosemite National Park] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper] [Linux Media]

Powered by Linux