On Thu 24-08-23 10:27:46, Baokun Li wrote: > Hello, Jan! > > On 2023/8/24 1:05, Jan Kara wrote: > > On Thu 17-08-23 16:18:28, Baokun Li wrote: > > > After 7d79b40b ("e2fsck: adjust quota counters when clearing orphaned > > > inodes"), we load all the quotas before we process the orphaned inodes, > > > and when we load the quotas, we check the checsum of the bbitmap for each > > > group. If one of the bbitmap checksums is wrong, the following error will > > > be reported: > > > > > > “Error initializing quota context in support library: > > > Block bitmap checksum does not match bitmap” > > > > > > But loading quotas comes before checking the current superblock for the > > > EXT2_ERROR_FS flag, which makes it impossible to use e2fsck to repair any > > > image that contains orphan inodes and has the wrong bbitmap checksum. > > > So delaying quota loading until after the EXT2_ERROR_FS judgment avoids > > > the above problem. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@xxxxxxxxxx> > > This certainly looks better but I wonder if there still isn't a problem if > > the bitmap checksums are wrong but EXT2_ERROR_FS is not set. Shouldn't we > > rather move the initialization of the quota files after the call to > > e2fsck_read_bitmaps()? > > > > Honza > When the bitmap checksums are wrong but EXT2_ERROR_FS is not set, we must > have lost some data (error flag or group descriptor or bitmap), so there > is something wrong with the kernel at this time, so I don't think we > should fix the image directly, but rather let the user realize that > something is wrong with the filesystem logic. I agree it means there is a problem somewhere (the storage, the kernel, or similar). But just ignoring bitmap checksums in release_orphan_inodes() is exactly how e2fsck behaves on filesystems without quota feature so I see no reason for quota feature to change that because the inconsistency has nothing to do with quotas... > Moreover, if we don't care how this happened, but just want to fix the > image, we only need to run "e2fsck -a" twice. After merging in the > current patch, we always empty the orphan list before loading the quotas, > and EXT2_ERROR_FS is set when loading the quotas fails, so this will be > fixed the second time you run e2fsck. It will not happen that every > e2fsck will fail like it did before. I see, you're right so it isn't as bad as I originally thought but still my argument above holds - IMO e2fsck should treat wrong bitmap checksums the same way with and without the quota feature. Honza -- Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx> SUSE Labs, CR